White Collar Criminal Defense

Overview

The most important decisions in a white-collar investigation may come before charges are filed.

White collar cases rarely begin with an arrest. They begin quietly: a letter from an investigator, a subpoena for records, a call from a forensic auditor, or a request to “come in and clear a few things up.” By the time charges are filed, the government has often been building its case for months, gathering documents, emails, and bank records while the target has no idea how much is already known. The most important defense decisions are frequently made in that window, before a single charge exists, and they’re made better with counsel than without.

Boyadzhyan Legal Shield defends individuals and professionals throughout Los Angeles and the San Fernando Valley who are under investigation for or charged with financial crimes: fraud, embezzlement, forgery, grand theft, identity theft, money laundering, bribery, and related offenses. Before serving as a Deputy Public Defender, founding attorney Knarik Boyadzhyan worked as a paralegal in the United States Department of Justice's Violent and Organized Crime Section.

White collar charges turn almost entirely on one question: what did you intend? These aren’t cases about who did an act. The paperwork usually shows that plainly. They are about whether an honest mistake, a business dispute, a bookkeeping error, or a good-faith belief that money was owed has been recast as a crime. Because intent is provable only by inference, the same facts can support very different stories, and the story the government tells is not the only one available.

We approach every matter with discretion. Reputations, professional licenses, security clearances, and careers are often at greater risk than jail, and a white collar accusation can do lasting damage long before a court ever weighs in. From the first contact, our focus is protecting your record, your livelihood, and your name, quietly where possible, and aggressively when the case demands it.

If you have been contacted by an investigator, get counsel before you respond

A request for records, a “voluntary” interview, or a call from a fraud investigator or auditor isn’t a formality. It’s the government gathering evidence. Anything you say or hand over can shape the charges that follow. You’re generally not required to answer questions or produce documents without legal advice. Before you send anything, read our guide to a business-records subpoena or investigative request: preserving a record and producing it aren’t the same act.

White collar crime at a glance

OffenseHow chargedCustody exposureKey drivers
Grand theft (§ 487)WobblerUp to 3 yearsLoss over $950; aggregation of amounts; prior record
Embezzlement (§ 503)Charged by value as theftUp to 3 years (felony)Value taken; position of trust; restitution
Forgery (§ 470)WobblerUp to 3 yearsInstrument type; amount; intent to defraud
Identity theft (§ 530.5)WobblerUp to 3 yearsNumber of victims; use made of the information
Insurance fraud (§ 550)Wobbler / felonyUp to 5 yearsClaim amount; pattern; expert proof of falsity
Aggravated white collar (§ 186.11)EnhancementAdds up to 5 years$100k+ loss; pattern of 2+ related felonies; asset freeze

General California ranges. Whether an offense is charged as a misdemeanor or felony, and the penalties that follow, depend on the amount involved, the number of victims, prior record, and the specific statute. These figures are general information, not a prediction of any outcome, and do not address separate federal exposure.

White collar crimes we defend

Fraud

Fraud is an umbrella covering many charges: wire and mail fraud (using electronic communications or the postal system to carry out a scheme), securities fraud (misrepresentations in the sale of investments), insurance fraud, healthcare and billing fraud, mortgage and real-estate fraud, and business-opportunity schemes. Each generally requires the government to prove an intent to deceive for financial gain, which is often the weakest link in its proof.

Embezzlement (Penal Code § 503)

Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property by someone the owner trusted with it, an employee, bookkeeper, fiduciary, or officer. Unlike ordinary theft, the property was lawfully in your possession, so these cases turn on whether an authorized use, a genuine dispute, or a reconciled account has been mischaracterized as misappropriation.

Grand theft (Penal Code § 487)

Theft of money, labor, or property is grand theft, generally chargeable as a felony, when the value exceeds $950; below that threshold it’s usually petty theft. Because value drives the charge, how losses are calculated and aggregated is frequently contestable and central to the defense.

Forgery (Penal Code § 470)

Forgery covers signing another's name, altering a document, or passing a false instrument, checks, contracts, deeds, or records, with intent to defraud. A signature made with actual or believed authority, or without fraudulent intent, is not forgery.

Identity theft (Penal Code § 530.5)

Using another person's identifying information for an unlawful purpose is identity theft, a wobbler that can be charged as a felony. These cases often rest on digital evidence and inferences about who actually accessed or used the information.

Credit-card fraud (Penal Code § 484e)

Acquiring, selling, or using an access card or account information without the cardholder's consent, and related counterfeiting, are charged under the access-card statutes. Value and intent again shape whether a matter is a misdemeanor or a felony.

Money laundering

Conducting transactions to conceal the source of criminally derived proceeds is money laundering, frequently charged alongside an underlying fraud or drug allegation and used to add exposure. These charges depend on proving both the criminal source of the funds and knowledge of it.

Insurance fraud (Penal Code § 550)

Knowingly presenting a false or inflated claim, auto, property, health, workers' compensation, or disability, is insurance fraud. Investigators from carriers and the state build these files with recorded statements and expert reports that can often be challenged.

Bribery & public corruption (Penal Code §§ 67–68)

Offering or giving a bribe to a public official (§ 67 (opens in new window)), or an official asking for or receiving one (§ 68 (opens in new window)), are corruption charges. They hinge on proving a corrupt intent to influence an official act, not merely a payment or a gift, and that’s usually where the case is contested.

Extortion (Penal Code § 518)

Obtaining property or an official act through a wrongful threat, of force, exposure, or accusation, is extortion, sometimes charged in business disputes and demand-letter situations where the line between lawful negotiation and threat is contested.

Tax evasion & related revenue offenses

Willful failure to report income or pay tax, and related state revenue offenses, require proof of willfulness, that any error was deliberate rather than negligent or the product of reliance on an accountant. Parallel state and federal exposure is common and must be managed together.

Our defense

How we defend a white collar case

No fraudulent intent

Almost every white collar offense requires a specific intent to defraud, deceive, or steal. A mistake, a misunderstanding, negligence, or a failed but honest business venture is not a crime. Because intent must be inferred from circumstances, we build the record, emails, contemporaneous notes, accountant communications, that speaks to your state of mind at the time.

Good-faith belief / claim of right

A genuine belief that you were entitled to the money or property, or that you had authority to act as you did, negates the intent these charges require, even if that belief was mistaken. In embezzlement and theft matters especially, a bona fide claim of right is a complete defense where the facts support it.

Insufficient evidence

Financial cases are documentary, and the government's story is only as strong as its reconstruction of thousands of records. Gaps, alternative explanations, unreconciled accounts, and reliance on assumptions rather than proof are frequently the difference between a charge and a conviction.

Mistaken identity or unauthorized access

In identity-theft, access-card, and cyber-enabled cases, the central question is who actually acted. Shared devices and accounts, compromised credentials, and thin digital attribution often leave reasonable doubt about whether the accused is the person responsible.

Entrapment

Where an informant or undercover agent induced conduct a person was not otherwise predisposed to commit, entrapment can bar a conviction. Corruption and fraud stings are fertile ground for this defense.

Unlawful search or seizure

White collar cases are built on records seized under warrants and subpoenas. When a search exceeded its scope, a warrant lacked probable cause, or privileged material was taken, we move to suppress the evidence under Penal Code § 1538.5, which can remove the foundation of the government's case.

Duress and lack of knowledge

An employee who followed instructions without knowing they were part of a scheme, or who acted under genuine coercion, lacks the culpable mental state these offenses require. Distinguishing a knowing participant from someone caught in another's conduct is often decisive.

Investigation stage

Under investigation? Discretion and early defense matter most

A financial investigation is slow and document-heavy, and that changes what the early stage looks like. Agents and auditors gather bank records, subpoena emails, interview co-workers, and assemble a timeline for months before they ever approach you. If you have received a target or subject letter, a grand-jury or investigative subpoena, a request for documents, or an invitation to a “voluntary” interview, you’re already inside that process, and what you do next can determine whether charges are ever filed.

How a filing decision actually gets made, and what can be put in front of a prosecutor before it is made, is covered on our pre-filing representation page. A financial case adds a second front to that: the records themselves. Demands for documents can be narrowed, privileged material can be withheld, and a production made without advice is very hard to take back. None of that is available once statements have been given or documents surrendered without thought.

Discretion is part of the defense. White collar clients frequently have careers, licenses, businesses, and reputations that a public accusation can damage before any court rules. We handle these matters quietly, managing communications, avoiding unnecessary exposure, and protecting your name while the facts are still being sorted out. The instinct to “explain and cooperate” to make the problem go away is understandable and often costly; the better instinct is to get advice first.

Jurisdiction

Federal vs. state: who investigates a white collar case

White collar conduct can be prosecuted by the state of California, by the federal government, or sometimes by both, and which sovereign takes the case dramatically changes the stakes. State cases are brought by the Los Angeles County District Attorney, including its specialized fraud and major-crimes units, under the California Penal Code, and are heard in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Federal cases are brought by the United States Attorney's Office for the Central District of California, headquartered in Los Angeles, under federal statutes carrying their own, often harsher, sentencing framework.

The investigating agency usually signals where a case is heading. Federal financial crimes are worked by the FBI, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in securities matters, IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) in tax and money-laundering matters, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service in mail-fraud cases, and Homeland Security Investigations in others. State and local fraud is investigated by the District Attorney's investigators, the California Department of Insurance in insurance-fraud cases, the Franchise Tax Board and CDTFA in state tax matters, and local police financial-crimes detectives.

The dividing lines are practical: cases that cross state lines, move through the banking or mail systems, involve federal programs or agencies, or reach large dollar amounts tend to draw federal attention, while locally contained fraud, embezzlement, and theft are typically handled by the state. Federal exposure is generally more serious, determinate guidelines, restitution, and limited parole, so recognizing early which track a matter is on is a core part of the defense.

For residents of the San Fernando Valley, a state financial-crime case will generally be filed and prosecuted in the Valley's own courthouse rather than downtown, while a federal case is heard at the U.S. District Court in downtown Los Angeles. We advise clients on both tracks and, where parallel state and federal or civil and criminal proceedings exist, coordinate them so that a step in one does not damage your position in another.

Sentencing

The loss figure drives the charge, the enhancement, and the restitution.

California punishes financial crimes largely by the amount involved. The line that separates petty theft from grand theft, and misdemeanor from felony exposure, is generally $950 in value; above it, offenses such as grand theft under Penal Code § 487 (opens in new window) can be charged as felonies carrying up to three years in custody. Many white collar offenses are “wobblers,” meaning the prosecutor may file them as misdemeanors or felonies, and how a case is charged is itself something a defense can influence.

If money went out in small amounts over time, expect the prosecution to add them up. Penal Code § 487(b)(3) (opens in new window) treats takings by an employee or agent from an employer as grand theft once they total $950 or more in any twelve consecutive months, and those twelve months don’t have to line up with a calendar year, a fiscal year, or a payroll cycle. Whether a particular entry belongs in that total at all is often the first thing we look at.

A felony here also doesn’t automatically mean state prison. Penal Code § 17 defines a felony to include a crime punishable by imprisonment in a county jail under § 1170(h), and most theft and fraud felonies are written that way. Felony probation normally runs two years. For embezzlement, employee theft, and false financial statements where the total taken exceeds $25,000, § 1203.1(l)(2) lets the court impose three instead. That $25,000 line appears on almost no other California defense page, and it can matter as much to your life as the sentence does.

Restitution is central and often exceeds the fine. Courts routinely order repayment of the full claimed loss as a condition of any resolution, and the amount the government asserts is frequently inflated or double-counted, making the loss calculation a battleground in its own right, not a foregone conclusion. Fines, probation conditions, and forfeiture of assets can accompany a conviction.

The provision that most changes the stakes in a large California case is the aggravated white collar crime enhancement, Penal Code § 186.11 (opens in new window). When a person commits a pattern of related felony fraud or embezzlement offenses that results in the loss of more than $100,000, the enhancement adds prison time on a scale that rises with the amount taken, and the added term is greater still where the loss exceeds $500,000, up to five additional years at the top of the range. It also authorizes the court to freeze and levy assets to secure restitution, sometimes before trial, which means your own money can be locked up while the case is still pending. Because the enhancement requires both a qualifying loss threshold and a “pattern” of two or more related felonies against one or more victims, whether it applies at all is often contestable, and defeating it can matter as much as the underlying charge.

Beyond the sentence, a financial-crime conviction, which may be treated as a crime involving moral turpitude, a federal category with no statutory definition, carries collateral consequences that often outlast any custody. Professional licenses are directly at risk: doctors, nurses, lawyers, accountants (CPAs), contractors, real-estate agents and brokers, insurance producers, and other licensees are generally required to report charges or convictions to their boards, which can suspend or revoke the credential your career depends on. A conviction can also affect immigration status, security clearances, the right to possess firearms, and future employment and lending. Where a conviction cannot be avoided, we work to structure the outcome, the charge, the level, and the record, to limit these downstream effects, and in appropriate cases pursue expungement under Penal Code § 1203.4 (opens in new window) after probation.

Grand theft threshold

$950

Loss above this line generally makes theft a felony rather than a misdemeanor.

§ 186.11 enhancement

$100k+

A pattern of fraud losses over $100,000 against victims adds prison time and can freeze assets.

License consequences

Reportable

Charges alone can trigger reporting duties to a professional licensing board.

Local

White collar criminal defense in Encino & the San Fernando Valley

Boyadzhyan Legal Shield is based in Encino on Ventura Boulevard and defends white collar and financial-crime matters throughout the San Fernando Valley and greater Los Angeles, Sherman Oaks, Tarzana, Van Nuys, Woodland Hills, Studio City, Northridge, and the surrounding communities. For a professional or a business owner, a case like this is rarely only a criminal matter; it’s a licensing problem, an employment problem, and a reputation problem at the same time.

If you’re under investigation or charged with a state financial crime in the Valley, your case is most likely to be prosecuted at the Van Nuys Courthouse, which handles felony and misdemeanor matters for the San Fernando Valley. A federal white collar case is heard instead at the United States District Court in downtown Los Angeles, a different court, a different set of rules, and a different set of prosecutors. Working out which of those you’re facing, early, is one of the first things we do.

A quiet inquiry that hasn’t surfaced and a filed felony start the same way here: a confidential conversation about what you are facing and what can be done about it. We appear in Van Nuys and the surrounding Los Angeles County courts regularly, and we handle these matters with the discretion they require.

How we work
01

Confidential, urgent review

We meet privately to understand the investigation or charges, review any letters, subpoenas, or records, and assess your real exposure, state, federal, and collateral, before you respond to anyone.

02

Manage contact & preserve position

We become the point of contact with investigators and prosecutors, invoke your rights and privileges, narrow overbroad demands, and make sure nothing you say or hand over is used to build the case against you.

03

Investigate the documents & intent

We reconstruct the financial record, test the government's loss calculation, and gather the emails, notes, and communications that show good faith or absence of intent.

04

Resolve or try the case

Where possible we work to prevent charges, secure a dismissal or reduction, or resolve the matter through restitution, and we prepare every case for trial when that is the path to the best result.

Frequently Asked Questions

Questions About White Collar Investigations and Charges

If your question is not answered here, call (310) 877-7770 to discuss your situation.

No. Many financial crimes are prosecuted by the state, in Los Angeles, by the District Attorney under the California Penal Code, and heard in county court. A matter tends to become federal when it crosses state lines, uses the banking or mail systems, involves a federal agency or program, or reaches a large dollar amount. Some conduct can expose a person to both state and federal charges. Which track a case is on changes the stakes considerably, so it is one of the first things we assess.

It depends on the offense. Federal financial crimes are typically worked by the FBI, the SEC (securities), IRS Criminal Investigation (tax and money laundering), and the Postal Inspection Service (mail fraud). State and local matters are investigated by the District Attorney's investigators, the California Department of Insurance (insurance fraud), state tax agencies, and local police financial-crimes units. The agency that contacts you is often the clearest early signal of where a case is heading.

It varies widely by offense and amount. California generally punishes financial crimes by the value involved, with losses over $950 often making theft a felony that can carry up to three years in custody, and larger cases exposing a person to more. Convictions also commonly bring restitution, fines, probation, and asset forfeiture, and in significant fraud cases the Penal Code § 186.11 (opens in new window) enhancement can add years. Federal cases follow their own, often harsher, framework. Any specific figure depends entirely on the facts.

Often that is exactly when a lawyer matters most. White collar cases are usually investigated for months before any charge, and the decisions made during that window, whether to speak, what to produce, how to respond to a subpoena, can shape or even prevent the charges that follow. Counsel can communicate with investigators for you, present facts in your favor, and in the right case keep a matter from ever being filed. Waiting until charges arrive gives up that opportunity.

It can be. Embezzlement under Penal Code § 503 (opens in new window) is punished as theft, and it is generally charged as a felony when the value involved exceeds $950 and as a misdemeanor below that. Because the charge turns on value, how the alleged loss is calculated and whether amounts are properly aggregated are frequently contested. A position of trust and the amount taken also influence how a prosecutor files the case.

Possibly, but your intent is central to the defense. Many financial crimes require a specific intent to defraud or permanently deprive, and a genuine belief that you were entitled to the funds or authorized to use them, a “claim of right”, can negate that intent. That said, an intent to repay later does not always defeat a charge on its own. The details matter enormously, which is why these cases should be evaluated carefully rather than assumed one way or the other.

Generally, do not answer questions or hand over documents without speaking to a defense attorney first, and do not try to “explain” your way out, investigators are gathering evidence, and well-meaning statements often become part of the case. You are typically not required to submit to a voluntary interview. Preserve relevant records, avoid discussing the matter with co-workers or others who may be witnesses, and get confidential advice about how to respond.

Common defenses include lack of fraudulent intent, a good-faith belief or claim of right, insufficient or ambiguous documentary evidence, mistaken identity or unauthorized account access, entrapment in sting cases, and unlawful search or seizure of records. Because these cases are built on inferences about intent and on large volumes of documents, there is often more room to contest the government's story than clients expect. The right defense depends on the specific facts.

The aggravated white collar crime enhancement generally applies when a person commits a pattern of two or more related felony fraud or embezzlement offenses, against one or more victims, that causes a loss over $100,000. It adds prison time on a scale that rises with the amount taken, up to five additional years at the top of the range. Because it requires both a qualifying loss and a genuine “pattern,” whether it applies is often contestable, and challenging it can be as important as the underlying charge. The asset-freezing power in the same section is worth understanding separately, because it is broader than the enhancement. Under Penal Code § 186.11(d) (opens in new window), a prosecutor can ask the court to tie up your property before there is any conviction, and that applies to a single fraud or embezzlement felony over $100,000 even where no enhancement is charged.

It very often can. Financial crimes are often treated as crimes involving moral turpitude, a federal immigration category with no statutory definition, and licensing boards for doctors, nurses, lawyers, accountants, contractors, real-estate agents, insurance producers, and others usually require reporting of charges or convictions and may suspend or revoke a license. In many professions the reporting duty can be triggered by charges alone, not just a conviction. Protecting a license is frequently as important as the criminal case itself, and we factor it into strategy from the start, though specific board rules should be confirmed for your profession.

In many cases, yes. After successfully completing probation, a person is often eligible to have a conviction dismissed under Penal Code § 1203.4, which can help with employment and other consequences. Eligibility depends on the offense, whether probation was granted, and your compliance, and expungement does not erase every consequence. Where a conviction cannot be avoided, we also work to shape the charge and record to preserve as many future options as possible.

No. Retaining counsel is a routine, expected step, and investigators and prosecutors deal with defense attorneys every day, it is not treated as an admission of anything. What it does is ensure your rights are protected and that your side of the facts is presented properly. Choosing to speak with investigators without advice, on the other hand, is where avoidable harm usually happens.
Knarik Boyadzhyan speaking on the phone in the firm's Encino office.
Consultation

Talk to Knarik Boyadzhyan About a White Collar Investigation or Charge

Boyadzhyan Legal Shield defends white collar and financial crime cases throughout Los Angeles County from the firm's office in Encino, including fraud, embezzlement, forgery, and grand theft. Whether a subpoena or a request for records has arrived, an investigator or an auditor has asked you to sit for a voluntary interview, or charges have been filed, we can talk through where the matter stands, whether it is on a state or a federal track, and what to do before you respond.

Initial consultations are free and confidential, with no obligation to hire the firm.

This page is general legal information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. California statute references link to the official California Legislative Information site.

Related reading

All blog articles →